[Aurora-sparc-user] Installed 2.0 to SS4 ...
mat
mat at fsck.no-ip.org
Thu Jul 27 19:04:46 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Joacim Melin wrote:
> I have two SS5.s (110 and 170) and the 110 will get the 2.0
> treatment. And a Ultra 1. The 170 still won't work with Linux will it?
>
I can't speak for the SS5s, but my ultra1 is doing fine under aurora:
[root at aurora ~]# uptime
00:00:40 up 374 days, 19:15, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.00
I do have a sparc classic LX that I'd like to get around to trying
aurora 2.0 on though...
I'll let you know how I get on. Slowly, I would imagine.
- --
mat at fsck.no-ip.org | www.fsck.no-ip.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEyUaN3nxx0MO2o1sRCmw8AKCaD//dHStCK3TalDl9O5z2VyB3igCeMXwk
sGf3su9spWSAmKEr5Y6K9uU=
=8eN0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Aurora-sparc-user
mailing list